From real life to photoshop: Aishwarya's l'oreal shoot

Let me start by saying, they photoshop every friggin thing these days. Not just aishwarya rai, but every star gets photoshooped, every shoot gets photoshopped. So am not pin pointing at Ash or l'oreal. But want to show the difference photoshop brings to an image.

Photo on top is the real life photo of Ash shooting for her l'oreal ad. Bottom is the ad scan which went to print.

The bottom photo looks like Ash in her 20s. I wonder if that will fly?

None
Login or register to tag items


Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Anonymous's picture

too much over-discussion over color, bordering on stark obsession.... who cares. ppl are pretty no matter what color they are. it's her business, her melanin-count.. her image, her stardom

ritzy86's picture

I don't even like her much but she looks good in both and there is hardly any difference. She looks pretty in both and if anything she looks better in the darker version with darker lights. If you compared her Ms. World days pictures to throughout her film career or maybe candid shots to these than maybe there would be a huge difference or any difference but these shots are good. I like em.

Anonymous's picture

thats what i noticed, ash to me is not purfection cuz her on cameraness is so diff from real life, kareena for me all the way

Anonymous's picture

PEOPLE stop bashing her she is not the one that photoshpoed this and these are to completly differnt pitures

Anonymous's picture

wish she had kept her brown look. why is she so ashamed of it.

Anonymous's picture

She looks 20 to me in both pictures and flawless. Aishwarya represent perfection in both pictures

sapna's picture

Lol I don't see much difference. Only different ligths. You should have take another pic I think. Because in both of the pics she looks in her 30. Not 20. J

Anonymous's picture

Very big differences!!
I want to see her without make-up. She is the one who always wear make-up. People have never seen her without it like Kareena, Katrina, Priyanka... She must be ugly without it

Anonymous's picture

She looks exotic in the first pic. The second one looks pale and boring.

Anonymous's picture

yes now all actresses use photoshop ...but photoshop is to hide flaws ...why do they make ash white ...why ash allow them to bleach her? IS THIS HER FLAW ...is being brown a flaw that they make ash fair? I think this is an insult to india and indians and I cant understand people keep admiring loreal and ash.

another thing I realized ...

in these pics ash INDIRECTLY promotes loreal WHITE PERFECT .look at the back coverage of the magazine ...in one picture I saw online she holds it upwards to show clearly... well yes she reads it ...but no need to take it higher to attract attention...so once on skin bleaching media saying "ash makes india proud-ash stands proud says no whitening cream" AND NOW SEE WHAT SHE IS DOING ... I really stop admiring her any more she doesnt deserve a little bit of my admire ...all of her attitudes so fake all of her speeches stays in the air...not trustworthy

Syndicate content
\n