How Much Star's Charge for Each Movie - The Shocking Truth

How Much Star's Charge for Each Movie - The Shocking Truth
Movies
News
Star Kids
No Makeup

The shocking truth about star prices!

Aamir Khan's price, no wonder he only does one movie every 3 years.




Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Anonymous's picture

Salman khan bang bang bang....,love u...SADY

Anonymous's picture

hey
they should get in lakhs max

Anonymous's picture

Gone the days when actresses like Hema Malini and Sridevi used to charge more than the heroes if not equal.

Anonymous's picture

WHY isn't emraan hashmi on this list? He better be earning as much as Ranbir. Granted the guy doesn't work with the biggest banners but he is the only one who has given consistent hits in his career unlike Ajay and Sanjay who have had flops.

Anonymous's picture

amir khan ka rate boht ziada. please actrer aur actress apna apna rate kam karo.

Anonymous's picture

aamir 40 crores...what a joke!

Anonymous's picture

Ajay Devgan deserves to be paid more than Akshay Kumar! Ajay has been consistent and his films did 100 crore+ without any marketing or promotion! He's a two time National Award winning actor! Why should he be ignored in favour of overrated khiladi?

Actresses are still believed to be replaceable lot. Even despite their peak, heroines like Hema, Sridevi, Madhuri used to get paid far less than their male counterparts.

Among male actors, guys like Imran, Shahid are grossly overpaid! One can understand Sanjay Dutt or Saif get more money probably because they are senior and are also producers. What have Imran and Shahid done? Ever given a hit on their own? Without an established actress or their uncle making films for them?

Anonymous's picture

Bloody hell!!!! Katrina 3 to 4 cr for what darling? to exemplify what bad acting should be like? or to expose to the world how good looking you are? ridiculous

Anonymous's picture

The only heroines that should be even getting money are Priyanka, Kareena and Vidya (maybe Anushka)
But Deepika, Sonam & Katrina? They should be getting 1 crore max. They don't DO anything.

PC, Vidya & Bebo are expected, at times to carry an entire film on their shoulders, but because of the stereotype of actresses, get paid the same as Katrina does for standing in a Manish Malhotra saree romancing Akshay. It doesn't require the same amount of talent, but because actresses are known to be the "glam dolls" they all get paid the same.

The actors (most) do deserve the amount they're getting because the success of the film depends on them, thus why SRK gets 20 crores, and John gets 7, for example. SRK's film is more likely to be a hit, so it costs more to get him in a movie.

Anonymous's picture

John and Imran get paid more than Vidya...r u serious!!!!

Anonymous's picture

Why are actresses making far less than the actors?!! Talk about discrimination #$!#$@Q!!!

Anonymous's picture

Aamir is in a league of his own. He does not try to make extra money by even going to the extent of charging fees to attend people's private parties. Nor does he dance at others' weddings or do any stage/award shows or make guest appearances. He does not go to the extent of doing even ads for alcoholic drinks to make quick bucks. He is very careful and selective about products he endorses. Still he's the highest paid actor of Bollywood! Talent and quality speak for itself!

Anonymous's picture

Aamir Khan deserves it! His films are all successes and give profits. And his track record has been flawless in last decade. Plus he budgets his films sensibly. Never goes overboard. And as a brand ambassador he brings a sense of exclusivity to any brand, because he does not do too many endorsements.

His films have assured quality, good content and every filmmaker is forever vying to sign him because his name brings a certain value, because he enjoys respect and trust among audiences.

His strategy for keeping share in profits is good. He takes responsibility in case the film does not succeed. If the film is a success, he gets lot more money due to share as per profits, and if the film is not successful, then he gets less money. He is not like other stars who take their paychecks worth crores in advance, while the burden of film's failure falls completely on producer's shoulder.

LOL at a useless hater who thought Aamir's fees is a share in budget!! Poor guy or gal did not know the difference between budget or profit I guess.

And to the person who said SRK's films are bigger hits internationally - please look up box office websites dear! In any Indian film's revenue, 50% share of collections depend on money the film made in India! Overseas accounts for only 16-20% of an Indian film's revenue! Also, Aamir's 3 Idiots is the biggest grosser - both in India and overseas now. It's funny how fans of a star ignore the 1.2 billion people of India and think the entire box office collection and profits of an Indian film depend on overseas! :D

Brush up knowledge haters, before making comments in thin air!

Anonymous's picture

KAREEN SHOULD BE GITING MORE MONEEY THEN KAT. TEAM BEBO

Anonymous's picture

kareena deserve more then katrina. i dont understand why katrina is getting same as kareena. katrina doesnt know how to act and no Hindi language and ists so sad just becoz she is tall and white. kareena u rock and dserve more than every actress and been in industry for 10 or more yrs. go kareena

Anonymous's picture

As an actress pc really deserve more than kat and bebo.

Anonymous's picture

John 5-7 cr. for what? Bad acting in bad flops.

Anonymous's picture

Sun, 2012-04-08 20:28 — Anonymous

And 40 crore for Aamir is also exaggerated and a joke. Here are the facts : Total budget of 3 idiots was : 35 crore (how can aamir charge 40 crore?). Budget of fana was 30 crore, TZP 12 crore, dhobi ghat 10 crore, and ghajini was 60 crore . Even for ghajini, producers are not gonna pay him 2/3 (40 crore) for a movie whose total budget is 60 core, no way they can make the movie within remaining 20 crore, and pay for the sets, shooting, fight scenes, marketing, other actors, technicians, etc. Also, for Dhoom-3 and Talash, aamir isn't paid 40 crore. Talaash is sold to distributors at 80 crore, means its production cost would be somewhat lesser (around 60 crore). Again with the logic above, producer/director is not going to pay him 2/3rd (or 66%) of the total cost of making the movie.

calm down dimwit, do google a bit or at least read the article carefully before you decide to strain our eyes with your verbal diarrhea. It's the share in PROFIT not budget. Now scroll up and read it again. Do you know how much money 3 idiots and Ghajini have made? And FYI, TZP, Dhobi Ghat were produced by himself. He doesn't have to share his profit. He demands a lion's share only in the movies that are not produced by him.

Anonymous's picture

I think salman and katrina are very lucky otherwise they dont have talent.

Anonymous's picture

Both priyanka and vidya are smart actresses. Pc know how to make any apart from movies and vidya choice of movies are superb.

Anonymous's picture

Today this trend is changing. Pc getting offer of 11 crore and bebo getting offer of 8 crore.

Anonymous's picture

You nailed it... totally agree with you
..................................................
Sun, 2012-04-08 20:28 — Anonymous

I don't think the number for the actors is correct. Akshay cannot get paid 18-20 crore a movie. Housefull -2 's budget is 45 crore, producer -director are not going to pay akshay 20 crore , and then keep aside the remaining 25 crore for paying the remaining 11 actors, technicians, sets, marketing , productions costs, etc etc. Its just not possible.Same for his other movies- patiala house, thank you, khaat meeta, houseful, action replay they are overall made at budget of 35-40 crore, how can he get 20 crore in that?

John Abraham getting 5-7 crore is also cant be possible, firstly he isn't a lead actor, always had side roles ; Secondarily the budget of movies where he is working as a side actor is 10-20 crore, He cannot get 5-7 crore for his roles is 7 khoon maaf, jhoota hi sahi, force,housefull -2, de dhana dhan aashiyaen, shootout at wadwa , dostana, new-york when the lead actor/actress (PC, Katrina) even does not get paid that much , and the budget of most of these movies are within 15-20 crore

And 40 crore for Aamir is also exaggerated and a joke. Here are the facts : Total budget of 3 idiots was : 35 crore (how can aamir charge 40 crore?). Budget of fana was 30 crore, TZP 12 crore, dhobi ghat 10 crore, and ghajini was 60 crore . Even for ghajini, producers are not gonna pay him 2/3 (40 crore) for a movie whose total budget is 60 core, no way they can make the movie within remaining 20 crore, and pay for the sets, shooting, fight scenes, marketing, other actors, technicians, etc. Also, for Dhoom-3 and Talash, aamir isn't paid 40 crore. Talaash is sold to distributors at 80 crore, means its production cost would be somewhat lesser (around 60 crore). Again with the logic above, producer/director is not going to pay him 2/3rd (or 66%) of the total cost of making the movie.

Also, Imran getting more then Kareena? Doesn't make sense at all

Anonymous's picture

Disusting. Aamir was paid 40 crores for Dhoom 3 and Salman was paid 38 crores for Ek Tha Tiger so what does that leave for the heroines? Oh yeah 3 to 4 crores, thats it! I get that the Khans have the right to demand big paychecks since they are big box office draws but demanding up to 40 crores and leaving NOTHING for the actresses is just plain ridiculous. No wonder the actresses are so underpaid in this industry.

Anonymous's picture

Pc and vidya should get more.

Anonymous's picture

katrina all the way!!!!!!!

Anonymous's picture

Ohh..Kareena's PR who planted those 8 crore stories must be ashamed!!

Anonymous's picture

40 cr for amir lucky man
Cr for movies we should get tht money for tolerating thm

Anonymous's picture

Katrina and Vidya should be paid much more. They generate better returns than the other actresses and some actors. Anushka, Shahid, Deepika and Imran (though I love him) should be paid less.

The women who only play small eye candy roles and can't pull in the box office numbers should not be paid more just because they're being paid less than the men. The men who play small bogus roles and don't pull in the numbers should be paid an equally low salary to the low performing women.

Bollywood films are almost always made for profit and the pay should be given out according to the actor's profitability. The Khans are profitable :)

Anonymous's picture

I don't think the number for the actors is correct. Akshay cannot get paid 18-20 crore a movie. Housefull -2 's budget is 45 crore, producer -director are not going to pay akshay 20 crore , and then keep aside the remaining 25 crore for paying the remaining 11 actors, technicians, sets, marketing , productions costs, etc etc. Its just not possible.Same for his other movies- patiala house, thank you, khaat meeta, houseful, action replay they are overall made at budget of 35-40 crore, how can he get 20 crore in that?

John Abraham getting 5-7 crore is also cant be possible, firstly he isn't a lead actor, always had side roles ; Secondarily the budget of movies where he is working as a side actor is 10-20 crore, He cannot get 5-7 crore for his roles is 7 khoon maaf, jhoota hi sahi, force,housefull -2, de dhana dhan aashiyaen, shootout at wadwa , dostana, new-york when the lead actor/actress (PC, Katrina) even does not get paid that much , and the budget of most of these movies are within 15-20 crore

And 40 crore for Aamir is also exaggerated and a joke. Here are the facts : Total budget of 3 idiots was : 35 crore (how can aamir charge 40 crore?). Budget of fana was 30 crore, TZP 12 crore, dhobi ghat 10 crore, and ghajini was 60 crore . Even for ghajini, producers are not gonna pay him 2/3 (40 crore) for a movie whose total budget is 60 core, no way they can make the movie within remaining 20 crore, and pay for the sets, shooting, fight scenes, marketing, other actors, technicians, etc. Also, for Dhoom-3 and Talash, aamir isn't paid 40 crore. Talaash is sold to distributors at 80 crore, means its production cost would be somewhat lesser (around 60 crore). Again with the logic above, producer/director is not going to pay him 2/3rd (or 66%) of the total cost of making the movie.

Also, Imran getting more then Kareena? Doesn't make sense at all

Anonymous's picture

Actresses should at least deserve half the price of what top male stars are getting paid. Dunno why such attitude persists against these actresses. its gender discrimination. Priyanka, kareena and vidya are reigning actresses they deserve to be paid more than this undeserving male actors like john abraham and sanjay dutt. Amitabh gets paid 4 to 6 crores when he should be getting more. His charismatic presence still adds value to any movie. Hrithik should charge more. :D

Syndicate content
\n