'Lost out on a role because director felt I was not beautiful enough' - Anushka

'Lost out on a role because director felt I was not beautiful enough' - Anushka 0
'Lost out on a role because director felt I was not beautiful enough' - Anushka 0

In an interview to Indian Express , Anushka Sharma spills the beans on her career, rumors surrounding her anorexia and how she lost out on a role because the director felt she was not "stunningly beautiful".

I have only added the interesting bits here. Please read the remainder of the interview in the link provided. It's a good read.

I personally find Anushka quite pretty and I like her onscreen. How about you?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Yash Chopra film’s press release says that the film stars Shah Rukh Khan with the “very beautiful” Katrina Kaif and the “very talented” Anushka Sharma. Does that take off the ­pressure to look good or put on the pressure to act well?

(Laughs) I didn’t know how to react when I read that. I didn’t know whether I should be happy that I’m talented or be sad that I’m not beautiful. I remember having this conversation with my father. I guess I’ll have to find solace in Adi’s words who told me, “We chose you because you can act and that beauty is not your USP.” If you have to compare us, Katrina is definitely more beautiful. Being beautiful is important for films since it is a visual medium but the women I love have been such stellar performers that it adds to their beauty, like, Nargisji, Kajol, Rani Mukerji.

Ever lost out on a role because someone said you’re not beautiful enough?

Yes. I’ve met directors who said they were looking for an actress who is “stunningly beautiful” and that I didn’t look the part. It happened before BBB.

The perception about you is that you are very aloof. Has that gone against you?

I can’t hardsell myself. Mujhe sharam aati hai. I have a major pride issue. I feel if I’m good, you’ll see it and give me what is due to me. People mistake this for arrogance. It’s just that I’m proud of my talent, not of my stardom. With BBB, my talent got validated. I’ve decided to become selective about my work. I’ll do one thing at a time and cater to the audience that has welcomed me. I don’t think actors should have images. I don’t think I need a PR to survive this industry


Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Anonymous's picture

I think anushka is more beautiful than deepika&katrina but three of them are extra ordinary actresses!! And anu can do more better than anyone perhaps she is the rising star of bollywoooodd. And all that is our awesome anushkaaa, luv U!

Anonymous's picture

Aww such mean ppl! And she's quite pretty!

Anonymous's picture

Katrina is more beautiful and talented that's why she is having many super hit movies

Anonymous's picture

I think that deepika looks better than anushka.Well most of them say that anushkas jodi looks good tha deepika. But I think so that deepika looks more better than anushka and she suits to all actors in bollywood and also with yuvi.

Anonymous's picture

It's so stupid how Bollywood thinks that if a woman is very beautiful, and totally talent-less, she becomes a hit. And if she's talented, and not beautiful, she's not famous. Wtf? Katrina can barely speak hindi, and she's famous. Wow.

Anonymous's picture

I find her pretty, especially in Rab Ne Bana di Jodi, but seriously the actresses today none of them are truly anything special.

Anonymous's picture

Regarding, Wed, 2011-12-14 06:57 — Anonymous--> this sounds like a Miss India USA pagent, where a loser a few years back bombarded the sites with 'problem of the 'shorties' entering pagents. Her comments are on rediff if you care to google. Apparently, a lot of short people are welcomed in these pagents (having very beautiful faces)-- and this made her feel that the better ones (taller) had a harder time getting in top spots.

If you want to believe tall, fair and thin is India's bill of beauty-that's fine. But let others have their own bill of beauty, and that includes Indians. There are going to be voluptuous, slim, tall, petite,dark,light, curly hair, straight hair, and and sorts of people in Bollywood - and that's a good thing-- because India's bill of beauty is and should be diverse. Whether it's really happening or not (diversity) is debatable. As for Anuskha, she's getting top heroine roles already.. not working her way up like Bips or Pri. Not sure why you don't think she's not welcomed.. she's doing much much better than an arguably tall , thin, fit, nice haired, and incredibly beautiful face + incredible talent like Nandita Das , etc-- who does happen to be dusky-- and struggled and struggled. (by the way, she too lost out on roles not fitting in as beautiful due to her color).

And oh, by the way, Hollywood is filled with diverse faces-- not just exceptionally beautiful ones. The simple next door Reese Witherspoon go hand in hand with standard stunners like Theron. Blondes, brunettes, redheads, and and all sorts of races and colors. Wish Bollywood would follow the diverse lead.

Anonymous's picture

Whoa!!! Wed, 2011-12-14 06:57 — Anonymous--> "even chubby actresses".

Hypocrite much? First you claim what is healthy and unhealty, but in a world of eating disorders, you call people chubby? Yes, Bollywood welcomes voluptous and thin actresses... as for dusky (that's debatable). Most dusky artists start off either as character actresses depsite being very beautiful (i.e Nandita).. or as vamps (Bips/Pri) and have to pancake lightened to be 'welcomed', as you say.

It's very ignorant of you to call people chubby , stdout, etc... and then counter what is healthy and unhealthy.

By the way, the industry has seen successful tall , fair and having nice hair actresses (your ideal): Pooja Batra (nearly 6 feet tall) ; Sonali Bendre-- having incredibly beautiful faces.

there should be room for all and everyone should respect diverse opinions and tastes== and obviously Ansushka has her share of people who find her attractive-- otherwise, she would be playing vamp roles at the start of her career the way dusky Priyanka did (working her way up). She's obviously getting heroine roles- so she is fitting in some way.

IF YOU LOOK DOWN ON 'STOUT' , CHUBBY OR DUSKY AS LESSER, OBVIOUSLY, YOU ARE MAKING THE SAME MISTAKE AS THE ONES YOU POINT THE FINGER TO.

Anonymous's picture

I find it extraordinary unhealthy that a woman that looks like Anuskha is being labelled not beautiful.
If this is reflective of Indian mentality in the 21st c, then Indian has become way more westernised than I had thought.
She is lithe, thin (when not too thin, athletic) she is fair, her hair is lovely, she dresses well.
And yet, ppl seem to keep on reiterating TO HER FACE that she is not beautiful enough???
This is in the same industry where actresses that did not fit India's own bill of beauty have been welcomed, dusky actresses, short actresses, stout or even chubby actresses.
.

THIS COMMENT NEED TO BE PRINTED AND SLAPPED INTO THE FACE OF THE FILM INDUSTRY.

Anonymous's picture

so thats why shes starving herself?
if its of any consolation to her i dont think katrina is particulary beautiful. just prettily packaged

Anonymous's picture

yes thats right, she is not that pretty, she is cool

Anonymous's picture

1. if you are talented AND beautiful you will always be remembered ie madhuri, rani, waheeda rehman.
2. if you are beautiful ONLY you will be remembered to an extent..twinkle, lisa ray, malaika sherawat, malaika khan
THAT BEING SAID, anushka is more talented than Katrina n deepika but not AS talented as vidya n kareena
she is MORE beautiful than konkona n vidya but not AS beautiful as katrina and aish.

THEREFORE..she's hopeless.

Anonymous's picture

well, many people find her attractive and many do not. that's why to each is own.. and there should be diversity in Bollywood- not labels. obviously reading the posts, a lot of people are finding her attractive. everyone should have their own tastes.

Anonymous's picture

Aww, it must suck to be told that to your face!
Bollywood only values fair skin or "beautiful" faces.

Anonymous's picture

hey i find anushka d 2nd most beautiful actress today after kareena................nd katrina is nthng in4rnt of anushka.katrina is nw ageing and soon her botoxed beauy will nt b gng 2 work any more so d real anushka beauty will rise high nd high 4ever.

Anonymous's picture

Like Sonam her still face in pictures is quite plain, especially the lower half. She has a flat face. BUT she was lovely on screen in Rab ne and BBB. See screen beauty and photo beauty are two different things. Some beautiful girls can bore you aishwarya in action Replay for example. Imagine if Sridevi did that comic role! While some plain girls can fascinate you on screen thanks to their personality... Penelope cruz is a great example. She is a pretty enough latina in pictures but on screen she is a stunning goddess thanks to her personality, voice, acting

Anonymous's picture

And it is too early dear to say that you are talented. You have a long way to go to prove that. All the films you did are not a proof of an exceptional talent still. And thats a fact this women need to consider before talking.

Anonymous's picture

to hell with talent, even monkeys are talented

Rilwan08's picture

his is why indians r the worst people in the world,who tells someone you r not beautifull.suicide rate is high.i think shes very beautifull.and indians look down on people thats why kajol have 6 filmfares becouse they dont give other people a chance.in hollywood u don t have to have someone in the industry to make.this unacceptable

Anonymous's picture

beauty comes in all different shapes, colors and sizes... and if Anuskha thinks she's beautiful, she should believe in herself. there are always people who find some people attractive and others not... there are always people labeliing stars as average looking , etc. whatever, don't let labels get to you. Anususkha may be not our concept of good-looking, but she is someone else's concept... to each is own. beauty is subjective.

by the way, every model and actress has to deal with rejection and there is always someone who finds you pretty and someone you will not . that's how it all works for everyone.. not just Anuska.

p.s. glad this post is not litttered with hateful comments like some other actresses's posts...

Rilwan08's picture

this is why indians r the worst people in the world,who tells someone you r not beautifull.suicide rate is high.i think shes very beautifull.and indians look down on people thats why kajol have 6 filmfares becouse they dont give other people a chance.in hollywood u don t have to have someone in the industry to make.this unacceptable

Anonymous's picture

Director got ThAT RIGHT!!! look at her she looks nasty

Anonymous's picture

I bet she is definitely more beautiful than most.

Anonymous's picture

Anushka is not only beautiful but TALENTED

Anonymous's picture

i think she's better looking & sweeter looking that katrina

Anonymous's picture

Ofcourse anushka is beautiful.She has the sweetest face and a good rack.She jus tooo thin otherwise....her arma and legs need to be worked upon.

Anonymous's picture

awwww <3 cutie

Anonymous's picture

all she can do is play the role of an annoying high pitched teeny bopper girl... who ISNT pretty. anushka could look good with ranveer because he is uglier than her. with other heroes, she looks like a waste of space.

Anonymous's picture

If she is not pretty then who is else is pretty??? Kat???? Lol

Anonymous's picture

I think she has the wholesome fresh looks thing going for her rather than classic beauty.But not many of today's actresses are conventionally beautiful.Especially in comparision to the early lot who were simply perfect....Madhubala, Hema Malini ,Waheeda Rehman etc etc.

Anonymous's picture

yes u are not beautiful. ur "im talented" strategy can only take u so far. many are talented. its the complete package that works. anushka, u can loose weight, do slight smile enhancement and hang out with chopras and that icky ranveer but ur not beautiful. accept that. the sooner the better. if u are lucky and get some roles in the future, count ur blessings. just because u had runaway hit doesnt mean anything. Think Bhagyashree. Sorry girl.

Anonymous's picture

shes cute, but seriously ?? SRK and Katrina is a hot couple, but SRK and Anushka.....NEVER ! they cud choose PC, Karishma or Kareena...

Anonymous's picture

Well I agree, she not stunningly beautiful, but nor is Katrina...there is nothing beautiful in botox lips and long boring face, so it should be "talented Anushka" and "talentless Katrina"

Anonymous's picture

she is owning up to what is tru, i don't hear her complaining. beauty is overrated anyways.

Anonymous's picture

She has a STUNNING figure few other in bollywood have. Her face is likable in the manner of Renuka Shahane, Kajol etc. While in India being pretty is still enough to get you through Bollywood, in Hollywood most of the actresses are weird looking, or 'jara hatke' from the main stream, and thats their appeal.
But Anushka has managed to do very well for herself, she has become very successful in her own right at a very young age, despite having no filmi family. Sure, a lot of people love to watch her on screen, otherwise she won't be successful.
Bottom-line is, the pretty faces in Bollywood are ALL interchangeable, what a Deepika can do, that a Katrina can not or a Bipasha can not, it does not matter who you are taking if its just for a pretty face, and no talent. However, when it comes to actual meaty roles, there are only few lucky ladies who land the job, Vidya, Kareena, Priyanka, Rani, Kajol and now Anushka etc. Because, there are so few ladies in Bollywood who can actually ACT. Anushka has an advantage over Vidya, Rani etc that Anushka has a body to die for, is stylish and still very young. She will go a long way, she is pretty enough, if not stunningly beautiful, has talent, a mega watt smile, its good enough for me.

Anonymous's picture

IT MUST SUCK TO HAVE A BIG HEAD:(

Anonymous's picture

I don't think she is pretty but I would never say that to someone on their face.Yes she isn't beautiful.She belongs to tv serials not movies.

Anonymous's picture

I don't get it, she was a model at 14! And that too a successful one, being a showstopper, and working at Elite models alongside Lisa Haydon and Freida Pinto. If she doesn't think she is beautiful, why would she go after a modelling career in her teens?

Anonymous's picture

Well she is quite pretty and she would turn heads at desi parties.

Anonymous's picture

well shut up now because u got yash chopra's film!! geez what a sore loser

Anonymous's picture

She is so pretty! I don't get why people always say she isnt.

Anonymous's picture

its not about the physical beauty even though anushka is disproportionate huge head small body, she has a huge attitude problem ive seen her in toronto during iifa this year was not impressed with her attitude problem. she is but a mere one- two films old she needs to stay humble but no instead that one hit film with srk got to her head. even after watching her on koffee with karan with ranveer singh i felt she has a huge attitude issue like she thinks she the best in the industry and deserves all films. i give her some points for making it into the industry without any god father but she does not seem humble in any sense. ranveer on the other hand seems way more down to earth and can act waayyy better. future looks grim for anushka.

Anonymous's picture

please anushka dont compare yourself to rani or kajol they are both stunning and can act

you are average looking with the best make up and hair stylists and acting is ok
katrina is stunnning and can act as her movies are a hit

cherrycrush's picture

she may not be "stunningly beautiful" but she is definitely attractive, talented and likeable. That is so much more important than stunning/beautiful ala katrina kaif/nargis fakhri/whaever last walked out a docs office.

Anonymous's picture

she's on par with katrina. she's so humble...saying she's not as beautiful as katrina. way 2 go, girl!!!! :)

Anonymous's picture

she's beautiful the press release was an insult to katrina kaif calling her "very beautiful" implying that is all she can offer

Anonymous's picture

I find it extraordinary unhealthy that a woman that looks like Anuskha is being labelled not beautiful.
If this is reflective of Indian mentality in the 21st c, then Indian has become way more westernised than I had thought.
She is lithe, thin (when not too thin, athletic) she is fair, her hair is lovely, she dresses well.
And yet, ppl seem to keep on reiterating TO HER FACE that she is not beautiful enough???
This is in the same industry where actresses that did not fit India's own bill of beauty have been welcomed, dusky actresses, short actresses, stout or even chubby actresses.

Anonymous's picture

thts messed up.. cuz shes beautiful.. its so sad how the industry works.. they take fat ass actresses just cuz they are stars kids but they dont take normal folks who are way qualified and better looking and more in shape.. and ANUSHKA GIRL U ROCK, YOU CAN ACT, LOOK GREAT.

Anonymous's picture

She is pretty in her own way..... She carries herself well.

Anonymous's picture

She really isnt beautiful. Its not the size etc..its just her features are nt that pretty. But anyways, she knows it and is counting on her talent so its ok.

Anonymous's picture

I think she's way more beautiful than Katrina or even some other "beautiful" actresses & i'd rather see 10 of her in movies than 1 Katrina!

Anonymous's picture

She is beautiful but VERY full of herself. Trust me I have seen how much attitude she has and it is RIDICULOUS!

Anonymous's picture

i think katrina is definitely more attractive then her but she has more natural beauty and doesn't need a lot of makeup

Anonymous's picture

I think she is beautiful :)

Anonymous's picture

she is kind of average looking to be honest...her grin and smile is too wideeeeee

Anonymous's picture

anushka,you r far more beautiful than kat :)

Anonymous's picture

No nothing is like this.... She is a good Actor as well as Beautiful..., She is much better than Sonam kapoor, Soha Ali khan...Nargisji.., A Actor does not mean beautiful.. Actor depend on Acting, dance Each n every thing...
Rani is not too beautiful but She is gud actor n dancer.., Same for Kajol, Lara dutt, many more...,
A big xample Katrina kaif... She doesn't no how to act n dance.... She is zere in acting.... Bt she is numbr 1... dunt no wht hapnd to industry......

Anonymous's picture

Anushka is beautiful...

Anonymous's picture

wow...amazing...hats off to her....she is right she has talent...she does not need a PR...

Anonymous's picture

I never found her beautiful either. Only Adi must find her beautiful, just like he found Rani beautiful!!!

Anonymous's picture

I feel for her cuz i have the same huge face/head - tiny skinny body syndrome. even if the face is beautiful, it just looks disproportionate ugh!

Poll

KWK: The more entertaining Kapoors ?:

Top Movies

Who's online

There are currently 15 users and 5011 guests online.
\n