Not even one single cover say she was ever no.1!!!
----
True and that is because she was never a No.1. It is a hype created by her fans
Mon, 2012-08-20 07:14 — Anonymous
Not even one single cover say she was ever no.1!!!
Fri, 2012-08-10 08:43 — Anonymous
madhuri...........what can i say about her.....just beyond of words to describe her beauty and talent.......
Rare gem.................
Fri, 2012-08-10 02:43 — Anonymous
Boring actress
Thu, 2012-08-09 03:28 — Anonymous
Her makeup and fashion did not change even today!!
Wed, 2012-08-08 16:55 — Anonymous
LOVELY MADHURI THE BEST ACTRESS OF ALL TIME, NO ONE CAN TAKE YOUR PLACE MY QUEEN
Tue, 2012-08-07 17:28 — Anonymous
These covers are so bad and they are supposed to be her best?
She is super bad in fashion
Tue, 2012-08-07 13:02 — Anonymous
Only Sridevi.. Look at Sri covers and look at this
Tue, 2012-08-07 07:14 — Anonymous
Absolutely love the second cover and the one with Jadeja. Drooling over the photos in the end too. But Sridevi eats her up on both covers.
Sun, 2012-08-05 02:43 — Anonymous
Sridevi fans are such big time losers. Actually it's the same person who keeps on writing in all Madhuri posts. I can make out from the writing style. I don't like Sridevi but I never have the time, energy n inclination to take the pains to write against her. If I like Madhuri so much, I'd rather say/write good things about Madhuri in Madhuri related posts like what I'm doing here. Why would I go to a Sridevi related forum and write against here . Seriously this particular person who hates Madhuri as much as he loves Sridevi needs a psychological treatment, infact he could be a great case study for psychologists. How much time this guy has...I salute you man. Or may be Sri pays you. She can't afford a PR machinery so has hired just one guy who is online 24/7. And I know it's hard to find Sridevi's posts even in pinkvilla so you've to come here to bark. As per one survey in Filmfare, youngsters were not interested in Sridevi's comeback whereas in the same poll, Madhuri got the highest vote to be waxed in Madam Tussauds statue (she wasn't waxed then) and mind you, the other options were of likes of Aamir Khan, AR Rehman.. to name a few.
Sat, 2012-08-04 16:57 — Anonymous
Have always been loyal in the Sridevi camp here, no matter when people say they love both, there will be one favorite always. For me I never liked her. She is extremely limited, unlike sridevi who is versatile. Watching Madhuri always bored me to death, I guess she is good for her fans who know nothing about cinema, for them cinema is a few item songs to dance to, but fo someone like me who fast forward the songs (specially her item songs) I find her so limited and boring all the time.
For me sitting to watch her movies HAHK and DTPH was biggest nightmare that I don't want to repeat. I guess when you fast forward these songs she has nothing left in the movie to watch. I recommend her fans to watch her movies without the songs and see for themselves if she adds any value to the movie.
So the point is don't compare her to Sridevi because that will backfire you. Look at her covers and go and look at Sridevi's covers and you will see the clear difference.
Sat, 2012-08-04 08:43 — Anonymous
I liked all the covers except that cineblitz. Some people here are hardcore Sridevi fans and they hate Madhuri as if she has personally done something wrong in their life. It's true that Madhuri completely ousted Sridevi. But it's past. Both of them are icons. Don't criticize her just for the sake of it. She is miles ahead of Sri and sooner you losers realize it, the better it will be.
Sat, 2012-08-04 08:34 — Anonymous
I'm not her fan. But she never had any work done on her face. Even a blind person can see and say that she has the had the same nose since years. As a woman I think Madhuri, Aishwarya ,Raveena and Namrata Shirodkar have the most perfect face.
Sat, 2012-08-04 06:54 — Anonymous
"I recently flinched at an episode of Colors’ Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa where Madhuri Dixit, bouffant and curls, pancake filled in her laugh-lines, coloured eye shadow and all the get-up we remember her from the disastrous ’80s and early ’90s, wipe a tear off the corner of her eye before it hit her powdered cheek. She was moved to tears, she was saying, by a very heavy-set woman’s dance performance as a pan-handler, scavenging garbage dumps.
Undoubtedly, she’s a formidable talent as a performer. But at 45, it may not earn her enough money and nearly not enough opportunity. There’s always reality TV for celebrities on the fringe.
Dixit still conjures up the worst fashion crimes in Bollywood. She’s like a female Govinda. The excessive padding under her pointy bras would have been lampooned if the songs weren’t such big hits. (Note most of her hit songs are almost vulgar and revolve around the bust: ( Dhak-Dhak from Beta, Hum ko aaj kal hai from Sailaab, and Choli ke peechhe from Khalnayak). Her purple sari in Hum Aapke Hain Koun was so matronly, I was almost glad she was made to hook up with Mohnish Bahl and not Salman Khan."
By Namrata Zakaria
She is Female Govinda
Sat, 2012-08-04 06:24 — Anonymous
A tacky actress with a tacky look!
Fri, 2012-08-03 13:40 — Anonymous
"The High Price that Madhuri has paid for success"
What a disgracing title, Shakti Kapoor in his scandal recording has mentioned her name and said she is a lady that can do anything for money.
That just confirms all the suspicions surrounding her relationship with Subhash Ghai
Fri, 2012-08-03 13:29 — Anonymous
very funny some people are trying to create excuses for her low fashion sense in these pictures forgetting that she is still the worst actress when it comes to fashion taste today. She was never good looking and elegant and she will never will be one
Fri, 2012-08-03 03:16 — Anonymous
She never was a good looker. Never ever. This is all media created.
Fri, 2012-08-03 02:36 — Anonymous
Who's Khushboo?
Fri, 2012-08-03 00:43 — Anonymous
Madhuri was and is gorgeous. End of story.
Fri, 2012-08-03 00:20 — Anonymous
@every generation finds the preceding generations fashions tacky
agreed, very well said comment. While we find 80-90s tacky, at that time /era they would be saying the same for the 70s hipster /rockstar style fashion, printed shirts/colorful bottoms
Thu, 2012-08-02 22:29 — Anonymous
Thu, 2012-08-02 20:59 — Kitty
It's a shame that she was at her peak of beauty when the clothes in Bollywood were so tacky at that time! But she always looked amazing in Indian clothes...
------------------------------------------------
every generation finds the preceding generations fashions tacky. by that same token, we should not find anyone in preceding generations beautiful. but how is it that despite the lack of designer clothes, plastic surgery, advanced makeup and beauty regimens, we still have the madhubalas meean kumar, hemamalini waheeda rehman, sharmila tagore, mumtaz, zeenat aman, parveen baby, tina munim etc looking much more radiant and beautiful than maduri dixit in any of these pics? why make excuses for the fashion of the era for her, when the same applies to any of the other beauties, yet they managed to look great despite the tacky fashions of their time too
Thu, 2012-08-02 21:50 — Anonymous
Aww, old Arvind Swami was so cute.
And Madhuri's smile, TOW with Jadeja on the cover, was so lovely.
Thu, 2012-08-02 21:35 — Anonymous
Voiceswriter don't confuse "eras" with "generations" sweetie :P
It's a shame that she was at her peak of beauty when the clothes in Bollywood were so tacky at that time! But she always looked amazing in Indian clothes...
Thu, 2012-08-02 18:44 — Anonymous
Aishwarya came a bit after the Sridevi-Madhuri era. Although she won Miss World in 1994 she did not debut in bollywood until 1997 w/ Aur Pyaar Hogaya (which flopped) and didn't get really noticed (in hindi films) until 1999 in Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam. So thats why she's not on the covers of theses magazines since the majority are from the late 80's to late 90's.
Thu, 2012-08-02 18:22 — Anonymous
She is sooo talented...love her!
Thu, 2012-08-02 18:22 — Anonymous
Thu, 2012-08-02 15:44 — Anonymous. Did she had a nose job??????
Of course she did. You can see her old nose in her first films especially in her debut Abodh. Just google and compare the difference.
Post new comment
Not even one single cover say she was ever no.1!!!
----
True and that is because she was never a No.1. It is a hype created by her fans
Not even one single cover say she was ever no.1!!!
madhuri...........what can i say about her.....just beyond of words to describe her beauty and talent.......
Rare gem.................
Boring actress
Her makeup and fashion did not change even today!!
LOVELY MADHURI THE BEST ACTRESS OF ALL TIME, NO ONE CAN TAKE YOUR PLACE MY QUEEN
These covers are so bad and they are supposed to be her best?
She is super bad in fashion
Only Sridevi.. Look at Sri covers and look at this
Absolutely love the second cover and the one with Jadeja. Drooling over the photos in the end too. But Sridevi eats her up on both covers.
Sridevi fans are such big time losers. Actually it's the same person who keeps on writing in all Madhuri posts. I can make out from the writing style. I don't like Sridevi but I never have the time, energy n inclination to take the pains to write against her. If I like Madhuri so much, I'd rather say/write good things about Madhuri in Madhuri related posts like what I'm doing here. Why would I go to a Sridevi related forum and write against here . Seriously this particular person who hates Madhuri as much as he loves Sridevi needs a psychological treatment, infact he could be a great case study for psychologists. How much time this guy has...I salute you man. Or may be Sri pays you. She can't afford a PR machinery so has hired just one guy who is online 24/7. And I know it's hard to find Sridevi's posts even in pinkvilla so you've to come here to bark. As per one survey in Filmfare, youngsters were not interested in Sridevi's comeback whereas in the same poll, Madhuri got the highest vote to be waxed in Madam Tussauds statue (she wasn't waxed then) and mind you, the other options were of likes of Aamir Khan, AR Rehman.. to name a few.
Have always been loyal in the Sridevi camp here, no matter when people say they love both, there will be one favorite always. For me I never liked her. She is extremely limited, unlike sridevi who is versatile. Watching Madhuri always bored me to death, I guess she is good for her fans who know nothing about cinema, for them cinema is a few item songs to dance to, but fo someone like me who fast forward the songs (specially her item songs) I find her so limited and boring all the time.
For me sitting to watch her movies HAHK and DTPH was biggest nightmare that I don't want to repeat. I guess when you fast forward these songs she has nothing left in the movie to watch. I recommend her fans to watch her movies without the songs and see for themselves if she adds any value to the movie.
So the point is don't compare her to Sridevi because that will backfire you. Look at her covers and go and look at Sridevi's covers and you will see the clear difference.
I liked all the covers except that cineblitz. Some people here are hardcore Sridevi fans and they hate Madhuri as if she has personally done something wrong in their life. It's true that Madhuri completely ousted Sridevi. But it's past. Both of them are icons. Don't criticize her just for the sake of it. She is miles ahead of Sri and sooner you losers realize it, the better it will be.
I'm not her fan. But she never had any work done on her face. Even a blind person can see and say that she has the had the same nose since years. As a woman I think Madhuri, Aishwarya ,Raveena and Namrata Shirodkar have the most perfect face.
"I recently flinched at an episode of Colors’ Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa where Madhuri Dixit, bouffant and curls, pancake filled in her laugh-lines, coloured eye shadow and all the get-up we remember her from the disastrous ’80s and early ’90s, wipe a tear off the corner of her eye before it hit her powdered cheek. She was moved to tears, she was saying, by a very heavy-set woman’s dance performance as a pan-handler, scavenging garbage dumps.
Undoubtedly, she’s a formidable talent as a performer. But at 45, it may not earn her enough money and nearly not enough opportunity. There’s always reality TV for celebrities on the fringe.
Dixit still conjures up the worst fashion crimes in Bollywood. She’s like a female Govinda. The excessive padding under her pointy bras would have been lampooned if the songs weren’t such big hits. (Note most of her hit songs are almost vulgar and revolve around the bust: ( Dhak-Dhak from Beta, Hum ko aaj kal hai from Sailaab, and Choli ke peechhe from Khalnayak). Her purple sari in Hum Aapke Hain Koun was so matronly, I was almost glad she was made to hook up with Mohnish Bahl and not Salman Khan."
By Namrata Zakaria
She is Female Govinda
A tacky actress with a tacky look!
"The High Price that Madhuri has paid for success"
What a disgracing title, Shakti Kapoor in his scandal recording has mentioned her name and said she is a lady that can do anything for money.
That just confirms all the suspicions surrounding her relationship with Subhash Ghai
very funny some people are trying to create excuses for her low fashion sense in these pictures forgetting that she is still the worst actress when it comes to fashion taste today. She was never good looking and elegant and she will never will be one
She never was a good looker. Never ever. This is all media created.
Who's Khushboo?
Madhuri was and is gorgeous. End of story.
@every generation finds the preceding generations fashions tacky
agreed, very well said comment. While we find 80-90s tacky, at that time /era they would be saying the same for the 70s hipster /rockstar style fashion, printed shirts/colorful bottoms
Thu, 2012-08-02 20:59 — Kitty
It's a shame that she was at her peak of beauty when the clothes in Bollywood were so tacky at that time! But she always looked amazing in Indian clothes...
------------------------------------------------
every generation finds the preceding generations fashions tacky. by that same token, we should not find anyone in preceding generations beautiful. but how is it that despite the lack of designer clothes, plastic surgery, advanced makeup and beauty regimens, we still have the madhubalas meean kumar, hemamalini waheeda rehman, sharmila tagore, mumtaz, zeenat aman, parveen baby, tina munim etc looking much more radiant and beautiful than maduri dixit in any of these pics? why make excuses for the fashion of the era for her, when the same applies to any of the other beauties, yet they managed to look great despite the tacky fashions of their time too
Aww, old Arvind Swami was so cute.
And Madhuri's smile, TOW with Jadeja on the cover, was so lovely.
Voiceswriter don't confuse "eras" with "generations" sweetie :P
It's a shame that she was at her peak of beauty when the clothes in Bollywood were so tacky at that time! But she always looked amazing in Indian clothes...
Aishwarya came a bit after the Sridevi-Madhuri era. Although she won Miss World in 1994 she did not debut in bollywood until 1997 w/ Aur Pyaar Hogaya (which flopped) and didn't get really noticed (in hindi films) until 1999 in Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam. So thats why she's not on the covers of theses magazines since the majority are from the late 80's to late 90's.
She is sooo talented...love her!
Thu, 2012-08-02 15:44 — Anonymous. Did she had a nose job??????
Of course she did. You can see her old nose in her first films especially in her debut Abodh. Just google and compare the difference.
I am trying to catch up on my Sridevi, she is one bollywood heroine I know so little of.
i forgot how meautiful she was! great reminder.