Touchy-feely shoot lands Neetu Chandra in MNS trouble

Touchy-feely shoot lands Neetu Chandra in MNS trouble
Movies
News
Star Kids
No Makeup

Touchy-feely shoot lands Neetu Chandra in MNS trouble

Recently, when actress Neetu Chandra (of Oye Lucky! Lucky Oye! fame) agreed to do a bold photo shoot for a men’s magazine, she hardly realised it would spark controversy and outrage from political affiliates.

Neetu, who had agreed to do hot and sexy cover for ‘The Man’ magazine, was shooting along with model Krishikha Gupta outside the lobby of a 3-star hotel, when a group of the hotel’s regular male customers watching it by the pool, suddenly started raising strong objections, by indiscriminately shouting at her and the magazine crew. But only when things spiralled into an ugly argument and the group started screaming “Jai Maharashtra” at the top of their lungs, did the magazine’s team and Neetu realise that things were out of their control.

Alleging that the shoot was promoting lesbianism, the group began getting aggressive and tried to physically harm the shooting crew. They claimed to have connections with Raj Thackeray’s Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and threatened an agitation. They even tried to confiscate the camera, resulting in the shoot having to be abruptly called off.

“Though the concept about two girls getting very intimate was a bit outrageous, we were doing it very aesthetically. But these men were a frustrated lot and couldn’t take the heat. They only saw nudity in our concept,” fires Neetu Chandra.

The actress explains, “First they tried to seek my attention with smiles and stares, so I acknowledged them. But as I went on with my work, the whole group of men suddenly started feeling ignored and began creating a scene. They did manage to scare me when they started to politicise the issue and scream communal slogans. That was when we had to stop the shoot.”

But now ‘The Man’ has decided to go ahead with the images they managed before the ruckus at the hotel began, raising speculation whether these sensational images will cause further problems when the magazine’s next issue hits the stands in a couple of days




Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Catharina Amalia's picture

Is she lesbian?

Anonymous's picture

India kahan se kahan jaraha hai. What next?

Anonymous's picture

I DONT AGREE....

Anonymous's picture

last photo...she should have just stuck hand in panty.

Anonymous's picture

Last pic OMG!!

Anonymous's picture

this is just tacky!
agree with Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 2009-06-09 21:43.

Anonymous's picture

really hot

Anonymous's picture

has broken all the limits

Anonymous's picture

i am cool with homosexuality, but i am sure these pictures would put off even a gay person.

Anonymous's picture

I am not against homosexuality or for it...Im just neutral. BUT this is so TACKY!!! Like seriously!

raghav's picture

this is truly the best post in pinkvilla =D

Zwanas_only's picture

I dont have a prob with homosexuality but I think there were lot more other decent sexy way to show it rather then showing it like some C - grade movies .

radiant's picture

one thing is to say ok ppl should accept homosexuality, etc, but another is to remember that many people find it offensive, especially in india. by forcing in their faces they will become more aversive , it wont change the way they view it...its been like that for hundreds of centuries. accepting is one thing, but another thing is not to force straight ppl to accept it, should also let non homos live and let live too.

Anonymous's picture

if neetu chandra was anil kapoor's daughter she would be endorsing loreal.

mans's picture

the other girl's bikini is eeewwwww....

Anonymous's picture

sick!!!!!!!!!!!

Preeti's picture

This is a complete disaster!! Have these 2 girls lost their minds? Theres nothing wrong about homosexuality! But there are other ways to depict it!Not these dirty craps! The last pic is nothing less than horseshit! what do they want to show?? vulgarity? Go home girls and put some clothes on!

mimoh's picture

hamana hamana :D

-Samaira-'s picture

this is something boys lik raghav (no offence hun) would be interested in but not girls

so ovbiously guys find it good and girls find it DISGUSTING!!

i do... i think this pics are EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

BUT why is homosexuality such a bad thing??? i mean love is love, you cnt choose who to fall in love with?? some indians are sick

gudgal's picture

Its totally OK to be homosexual and it is OK to publicly express it if you are 1.....but these pictures are so freaking tasteless!!!!! These are sending wrong signals to the public...I know men like lesbians....but these shots are disgusting and shitty!! Had they been doen aesthitcally, it would not look so vulgar!! Look at the last pic...the 2nd gal has totally lost her sense of posing and I would totally blame the shot-stylist too!!...I appreciate Neetu for these shots...bold but totally done wrong!!

dusky_chica's picture

India is not ready for this, if she's getting criticized it was to be expected. I'm not a fan of it but considering its for a mens magazine what else would you expect in it?

Anonymous's picture

nice...I like it

cherrycrush's picture

this is gross.

Anonymous's picture

seriously, its way over time we live and let live. whats the big deal in this?! homosexuality IS a part of society whether we sweep it under the rug or not.

Anonymous's picture

sasha are you a chick?

Anonymous's picture

this is soo sick

Anonymous's picture

I m not but wanna try... like the pics above.. ooh they turn on

Anonymous's picture

lolz, the other model seems to be wearing a victorias secret bra than a bikini...

Anonymous's picture

disgusting

sasha's picture

I have no issues with homosexuality. This shoot would have looked cheap even if the couple was heterosexual.

Syndicate content
\n