Priyanka Chopra Jonas’ ex sister in law posts a cryptic pic online; Was she hinting at Siddharth Chopra?

Updated on May 31, 2019 01:00 PM IST  |  2.6M
   
News,Siddharth Chopra,Priyanka Chopra Jonas,Ishita Kumar
Priyanka Chopra Jonas’ ex sister in law posts a cryptic pic online; Was she hinting at Siddharth Chopra?
Advertisement

Hardly two months after Priyanka Chopra got married to Nick Jonas, the actress shared pictures of her brother Siddharth Chopra and Ishita Kumar’s roka ceremony. It was announced that the two will be getting married sometime in April and Priyanka had flown down to India for the same. However, the date passed on and while everybody was waiting for the pictures to surface on the internet, reports came out that PeeCee had gone back to New York and the wedding was cancelled.

Priyanka and Siddharth’s mother, Madhu Chopra, had confirmed that the wedding was mutually called off. However, she remained tight-lipped when asked for details of the same. Following this, Ishita unfollowed her ex-fiancé from all social media websites and removed all pictures of their roka ceremony. Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time that this has happened with Siddharth. Back in 2014, for unknown reasons, his wedding with his then girlfriend had been cancelled.

According to the buzz, Ishita Kumar is moving on in her life and is currently working in London. She recently posted a cryptic picture on her social media handle and few of her followers asked if it was hinted at Siddharth. The text in the post reads: “Men no longer give us butterflies.. Straight high blood pressure now.”

Check out the comments:

1_1157

2_888

3_949

Earlier this year, Priyanka had posted a picture of Siddharth and Ishita on social media, welcoming her to the family. Her caption read: “So proud of my baby brother. Ishita welcome to the family...you are so beautiful together...I wish you both the best for the future! Happy Roka!! @ishittaakumar @siddharthchopra89.”

Advertisement

Comments
User Avatar
User Avatar
Anonymous : That ugly-fugly should be grateful someone bothered to take him as a boyfriend.
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : Hah @tayjackson992 has got to be someone from Chopra family incognito
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : The fact that Priyanka's Mom had to make a statement only means that there was some kind of a big fall out from their side. She had to add that it was mutual for people to stop talking about it.
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : she dodged a bullet !
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : She might be posting all this stuff right now bc shes bitter but she’ll really regret the drama in a couple of years because she’ll be known as “priyankas brothers ex-fiance”. She really need to hide low for a bit so people can forget her and she can continue on with her life.
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : May be publicity was what she wanted
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : he is fugly she is too good looking for him anybody knows what he does for a living?
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : is he closeted? just come out.
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : Never bring outsiders to any family-issues, fifty percent don’t care, the other half are glad you have this problem.
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : PC & her dodgy family! Eeeeks
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : Keep your eyes and brain wide open before marriage to see and discern bcz after marriage there is only failure, heartbreak and tears.
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : So clearly Sid is the one that dumped her. She should move on. Posting cryptic things just makes her look bad.
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : She is too good looking for him. The only plus point with him is that he is priyanka's brother. Nothing else to add to that.
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : What a ridic title. She is not an ex sister, they were never married.
REPLY 0 2 years ago
User Avatar
Anonymous : Good for the girl who moved on..
REPLY 0 2 years ago